|
White Paper: OSP/OBRA Waiver Renewel Eligibilty
COMMENT ON: Pennsylvania's OSP/OBRA Waiver Renewal and Amendment,
effective July 1, 2001 (a waiver of Section 1915(c) of the Social
Security Act to provide home and community-based services to persons
who would otherwise require ICF/ORC services)
OVERVIEW OF ALAW'S CONCERNS:
-In April 1998, ALAW presented a paper to the Pennsylvania Department
of Public Welfare which demonstrated that adults with autism are
entitled to ICF services under federal Medicaid rules.
-In a subsequent meeting, DPW agreed with ALAW's position, and
proposed the initiation of a pilot program to provide home and community-based
services to adults with autism.
-The pilot program was to be planned and implemented by DPW and
AL-AW in partnership.
-The DPW/ALAW working group was formed, and the pilot program to
serve 20 adults with autism was planned over the course of multiple
meetings.
-The planning included eligibility criteria, specifying that adults
across the autism spectrum be included in the pilot program.
-Following DPWs recommendation, pilot program funding comes from
the OBRA Waiver.
-By early 2002, the first phase of the pilot program was completed,
and the second phase was partially completed.
-Unaccountably, DPW convened a meeting of stakeholders to suggest
changes to the OBRA Waiver, but did not include AL-AW.
-The OBRA Waiver's new eligibility worksheet screens out those
with lQs under 70, who are to be served by the MR system. This is
a violation of autism pilot program eligibility criteria agreed
to years ago. If allowed to stand, this would force large numbers
of people with autism into the NM system, where they would receive
inappropriate services or, more likely, be put on a waiting list.
-We need to return to the original pilot program eligibility rules,
so that adults across the autism spectrum remain eligible for OBRA
Waiver services.
SPECIFICS OF ALAW'S CONCERNS:
BACKGROUND OF ALAW'S RELATIONSHIP TO DPW AND THE OSP/OBRA WAIVER:
In April 1998, ALAW presented a paper on "The State of Autism
Services in Pennsylvania" to officials in the PA Department
of Public Welfare. As a result of ALAW's demonstration that persons
with autism, a developmental disability, are entitled to ICF services
under federal Medicaid rules, DPW agreed to begin developing home
and community-based autism services via a pilot program. A series
of meetings were convened between ALAW and DPW staff, with leadership
by the Office of Social Programs, to develop an Autism Pilot Program
for 20 persons.
In the course of these DPW/AIAW Work Group meetings it was agreed
that eligibility for the Autism Pilot Program would be based on
having autism regardless of whether the person did or did not also
have a low IQ. Indeed, it was agreed that Pilot Program participants
should represent the spectrum of those with autism. It was also
agreed, upon recommendation of the Office of Social Programs staff,
that funding would come from the OBRA Waiver.
Over the past year, individuals and advocacy groups considered
'stakeholders' of the OBRA Waiver were convened to provide input
to the waiver renewal and amendment process. But neither ALAW, nor
any of the individuals in the Autism Pi@ Program, even though their
services were being funded by the OBRA Waiver, were included in
the stakeholders meetings. As a result, changes harmful to persons
with autism were included in the amended OBRA Waiver.
BACKGROUND OF THE OSP/ OBRA WAIVER AMENDMENT:
OBRA WAIVER TARGETED GROUPS:
According to checkoffs on the federal Medicaid Waiver Format, OBRA
services are targeted to:
- individuals who are developmentally disabled
-"Persons with other related conditions, severe chronic disability:
which (a) is attributable to cerebral palsy, epilepsy or any other
condition found too [sic] closely related to mental retardation,
but not mental retardation or major mental disorder as a primary
diagnosis..." (bold [in original] represents amended language)
OBRA WAIVER ELIGIBILITY WORKSHEE'F:
The purpose of this new worksheet is to assure that applicants meet
the waiver targeting criteria. The worksheet first asks for primary
and secondary diagnoses. After a list of "general exceptions"
there are "mental retardation exceptions" followed by
"mental illness exceptions." If any of these items are
checked "yes" the applicant is screened out. Under "mental
retardation exceptions" are the following:
"1. Does the consumer have a past or current Primary Dx of
Mental Retardation?
2. Does the consumer have a documented IQ below 70?
3. Does the consumer receive services through an MR Waiver?"
BACKGROUND OF FEDERAL RULES:
FEDERAL DEFINITIONS OF "DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY," "OTHER
RELATED CONDITION," AND "AUTISM":
In the Medicaid Manual, interpreting the "Requirements and
Limits Applicable to Specific Services" §4398. Persons
with Related Conditions, Rev. 23 (dated 12-86), HCFA discusses
changes in the definition of "persons with related conditions"
found at 42 CFR §435.1009. HCFA states: "Concern has been
expressed that the new definition of 'persons with related conditions'
does not include autism, although this diagnosis had been included
in one of the earlier definitions of developmental disability. Autism
is a disorder which is developmental in nature and which routinely
requires treatment similar to that provided to individuals who have
mental retardation and persons with related conditions. In fact,
the DSM 111, which is universally recognized as authoritative by
the medical community, specifically classifies autism as a pervasive
developmental disorder."
The above cited Medicaid Manual interpretation shows that under
federal Medicaid rules, autism is a "developmental disability"
and also an "other related condition."
ANALYSIS OF THE OSP/OBRA WAIVER RENEWAL AND AMENDMENTS IN RELATION
TO CRITERIA FOR AUTISM:
The newly developed OBRA Waiver Eligibility Worksheet (see also
above) is intended to determine if an individual applicant meets
the amended OBRA Waiver targeting criteria. The worksheet begins
by asking for the person's primary and secondary diagnoses. If the
person's primary diagnosis is "mental retardation" or
a "major mental illness," then according to the waiver
targeting criteria, that person would not be eligible. If the person
passes this initial screen, it would then be appropriate for the
worksheet to inquire if the person's primary diagnosis is a "developmental
disability," and if it is also an "other related condition,"
two other OBRA Waiver targeting criteria.
As long as the person's primary diagnosis is not "mental retardation"
or "mental illness," and the person's primary diagnosis
is a "developmental disability" and an "other related
condition," the person qualifies, according to the amended
targeting criteria in the federal waiver format.
However, instead of the above cited process, the OBRA Waiver Eligibility
Worksheet introduces additional criteria to the eligibility process
that are not part of the amended waiver format criteria. As such
they are not appropriate issues to weigh in determining whom to
exclude. Examples of illegitimate criteria used in the OBRA Eligibility
Worksheet are as follows:
-The worksheet asks about past as well as current primary
diagnosis for mental retardation (although the worksheet asks specifically
for a CURRENT [caps in original] diagnosis for mental illness.)
Only a person's current diagnosis should be utilized, as prior ones
may have been inaccurate.
-The worksheet asks about low IQ which, while part of the diagnosis
of mental retardation, can also be a component of developmental
disabilities and of other related conditions. Merely having a low
IQ does not determine correct primary diagnosis.
-The worksheet asks about MR waiver funding for services. While
a person cannot receive services from two waivers simultaneously,
current receipt of services from one waiver should not preclude
future funding by another waiver. Moreover, primary diagnosis cannot
be deduced from the funding category of services being received.
IMPACT ON AUTISM PILOT PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS AND OTHER PERSONS WITH
AUTISM THROUGH USE OF THE OSP/OBRA WAIVER ELIGIBILITY WORKSHEET:
The "mental retardation exceptions" described and analyzed
above constitute a grave problem both for persons currently in the
Autism Pilot Program and for other persons with autism seeking services
under the amended OBRA Waiver. Some cur-rent Pilot Program participants,
who were enrolled in the Autism Pilot Program under criteria established
by the DPW/ALAW Work Group, would not be found eligible under this
erroneous worksheet. Furthermore, people with autism who could be
served under the OBRA Waiver in the future would be inappropriately
excluded as well.
Either the OBRA Waiver Eligibility Worksheet must be revised to
correct these problems, or else applicants must be able to mark
"N/A" as a response to items on the current form under
"Mental Retardation Exceptions" without prejudice in determining
eligibility.
OSP/OBRA WAIVER ELIGIBILITY WORKSHEET
|